BPJ WIRE2026-08-22FEATUREMembers only14 min read
BPJ FEATURE

California SB54 doesn’t just raise print costs. It creates “rework costs.”

With SB54 in court and SB343 paused by injunction, North American packaging and label work now hinges on who runs state EPR × labeling × materials—and who pays for revisions, inventory, and mis-shipments.

California’s packaging EPR law (SB54) is already in force. But the same SB54 is being sued from both sides—too weak and too strict—while the recycling-labeling law SB343 is wobbling under an injunction.

Gathered with AI. Thought through on the shop floor. Written for the future of print.

BPJ WIRE: stories selected and drafted by the BPJ desk from world news, fact-checked against the source ledger — published alongside the editor's own picks.

Translated from Japanese by AI. The Japanese original is authoritative.

California SB54 doesn’t just raise print costs. It creates “rework costs.”

The same SB54 is getting hit from both sides

SB54’s regulations are in effect, but the disputes have not settled down.

First, the environmental groups. NRDC announced that NRDC, Californians Against Waste Foundation, and Oceana filed suit in a San Francisco state court, arguing that CalRecycle’s final regulations do not meet SB54’s requirements (NRDC press release dated 2026-06-04). Resource Recycling lists the filing date as 2026-06-02</stro…

The rest is for members

Read the full article. Our feature reports also carry an archive-grade one-page brief (BPJ VISUAL BRIEF) — every figure with its source.

$3 / month
・Full text of every issue, including the archive
・Archive-grade one-page briefs on feature reports — every figure with its source
・Early access to new issues
・Cancel anytime
Become a member

Already a member? Log in

Sources

Beyond Printing Journal — read the world through print, and print the future.

← All issues