The scarier threat than fake completion cards: “paper that won’t die after it expires”
A recall order and 1,000 unreturned cards point to a different fix: not stronger stock, but better verification and recall. How much responsibility should printers take—and where should they charge for it?
Warnings about counterfeit skills-training completion cards look like a design problem. But if you follow the government paper trail, what’s truly broken is the workflow: once a card is invalidated, the system still can’t reliably get it back. For printing companies, the debate can’t stop at proposing anti-counterfeit paper or holograms. The profit and the liability split changes depending on whether you stay in “card manufacturing only” or step into the post-issuance operating stream—issuance, expiry, reissuance, verification, and recall.
Gathered with AI. Thought through on the shop floor. Written for the future of print.
BPJ WIRE: stories selected and drafted by the BPJ desk from world news, fact-checked against the source ledger — published alongside the editor's own picks.
Translated from Japanese by AI. The Japanese original is authoritative.
Warnings PDFs about counterfeit skills-training completion cards sometimes include photos of the physical item. At a glance, it looks like “a plausible card.” So on many sites, the first instinct is to doubt the card’s authenticity.
But what the government side appears to see as the bigger problem is not the counterfeit face itself. It’s the operational failure: “after invalidating improperly issued completion cards, they still can’t be recovered.” The issue isn’t count…
The rest is for members
Read the full article. Our feature reports also carry an archive-grade one-page brief (BPJ VISUAL BRIEF) — every figure with its source.
Already a member? Log in
Sources
Beyond Printing Journal — read the world through print, and print the future.